<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Is The Product?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.productbehavior.com/archive/who-is-the-product/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.productbehavior.com/archive/who-is-the-product</link>
	<description>Not Just For Breakfast Anymore
</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:31:01 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.productbehavior.com/archive/who-is-the-product/comment-page-1#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 21:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbehavior.com/?p=147#comment-808</guid>
		<description>Hi EZ,

I&#039;m glad it&#039;s working for you. I agree that this kind of metaphor is useful for new products that might need some extra explanation - but I&#039;ve also used it successfully when considering &quot;old&quot; product categories that everyone already thinks they understand completely. In those cases, it&#039;s hard for companies to break out of the pack; thinking about what the product would be like if it were more like [name a celebrity here] is a useful way to get the designers thinking about new ways to approach the problem.

A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi EZ,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s working for you. I agree that this kind of metaphor is useful for new products that might need some extra explanation &#8211; but I&#8217;ve also used it successfully when considering &#8220;old&#8221; product categories that everyone already thinks they understand completely. In those cases, it&#8217;s hard for companies to break out of the pack; thinking about what the product would be like if it were more like [name a celebrity here] is a useful way to get the designers thinking about new ways to approach the problem.</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EZ</title>
		<link>http://www.productbehavior.com/archive/who-is-the-product/comment-page-1#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>EZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.productbehavior.com/?p=147#comment-800</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using your suggestion of personification to help me think of a name for a new product, and it has been quite helpful. It&#039;s also given me some ideas for the marketing strategy. It seems that it would be especially useful for products that are very innovative, that need a lot of explaining as to how they work and what benefits they provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using your suggestion of personification to help me think of a name for a new product, and it has been quite helpful. It&#8217;s also given me some ideas for the marketing strategy. It seems that it would be especially useful for products that are very innovative, that need a lot of explaining as to how they work and what benefits they provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
